Towards another paradigm for forensic science?

Daubert skews the contribution of forensic science because it only took into account its Galilean dimension (construction general predictive models). However, should better be classified in historical sciences (clinical approach to reconstruct a past event presence or activity). We therefore need complementary that integrates necessarily “clinical” part resolution issues. Such an evolution involves semiotics. While recognizing Bayesian way thinking is prescriptive available model for interpretation fitting well paradigm, complexity reconstruction past-uncontrolled singular case and robustness relevant data it, invites consideration implementation semiotic line arguments. Indeed, Bayes makes possible remain single harmonized integrating both clinical dimensions, but rapidly modeling mathematization come up against more qualitative natural legal reasoning. Two different systems reasoning at stake are inevitably creating “bug” could explain current crisis miscarriages justice. This anomaly reflected issue transparency (misunderstandings by between interlocutors on nature expertise, if not science). Peirce offers path address tension systems.